Comments on: Alex Jones fools America

By: dextras

dextras — Wed, 09 Sep 2009 05:09:40 +0000

i think it’s funny as. Nice going to the journalist. It’s not even April Fools

By: Kimmo

Kimmo — Wed, 09 Sep 2009 04:09:24 +0000

…Speaking of harsh, I meant if those guys had *more* sense.

By: Kimmo

Kimmo — Wed, 09 Sep 2009 04:08:05 +0000

I reckon Sheen wrote a great article; it’s just a crying shame it’s been totally mishandled like this.

If those guys had any sense, they would’ve disassociated the piece from PP in order for it to gain traction with a much larger audience.

If Sheen had submitted the article to a major daily newspaper, it would’ve received the amount and type of attention it deserves instead of throwing all but the the one-eyed converted offside.

That’s if any of em would print it… but I reckon it’d sell papers, so why not?

By: SuppressedReality

SuppressedReality — Wed, 09 Sep 2009 02:25:17 +0000

Sorry if I was a little harsh, just pissed at the way a lot of blogs / news outlets I have been checking are attacking it and completely ignoring all the facts presented. While it was a let down I agree why not at least try and get behind it they obviously put some work into it…Pass it along to people you know and you may wake a few up if they read it all. It’s also one of the best documented articles I have seen with all the key information / facts which I think is great the infowar. I disagree with AJ on some things but with his movies, radio show, and recently the poster contests, now this, the man may not do the right thing always but to me its clear hes trying to wake people up. Peace

By: Kimmo

Kimmo — Wed, 09 Sep 2009 00:34:28 +0000

Obvious? Jones spruiking his arse off on Youtube like that wasn’t a bad set-up; the way he was talking, I was like, what, just Charlie Sheen interviewing the Prez, is that all? And as I said, the appropriate place for such a disclaimer (particularly on an article of such length) is at the top.

And hey, got presumption much? Did I say anything pertaining to the actual content?

Oh wait, yeah – “valid concerns”.

You assume I subscribe to the official version.

You snottily imply I’m hanging shit on Jones and co because I’m supposedly biased against him… not the case.

Let’s get this straight. Ask yourself why I’d bother to read anything on Prisonplanet in the first place.

The Man needs fucking; that much is abundantly clear. But pulling cheap and nasty tricks on folks is hardly an appropriate means of generating publicity.

Now ask yourself whether I – and others – will bother to read anything there again.

Not a good idea, defending the indefensible by attacking people who make legitimate complaints.

By: SuppressedReality

SuppressedReality — Tue, 08 Sep 2009 22:39:35 +0000

The whole story was an obvious fake, if you believed it that’s probably why you still buy into the official story for 9/11. It was meant to get people to read it and see some of the facts and evidence of a 9/11 cover-up. Did you bother reading any of the facts like how sixty percent of the 9/11 commissioners say on record the government story was a lie and there needs to be a new investigation? So how about actually researching and debunking his evidence instead of getting upset that you were fooled.

By: Kimmo

Kimmo — Tue, 08 Sep 2009 17:52:35 +0000

I can see the point in writing such a piece, but that’s almost totally eroded by fraudulently posting it in such a way that the disclaimer isn’t obvious. It belongs at the top of the article.

Actually, I believe the article was up for a while even before it was added… which is truly beyond the pale.

If Jones et al want to ever command the merest shred of credibility, they might wanna learn about a concept called journalistic integrity.

It’s pretty frustrating, because perfectly valid concerns are discredited by this sort of crap.